Frederick Antonovics

Content from this author

• Berlin regulator issues first public fine since leadership change
• EDPB and European Commission officials defend the GDPR
• Representative Actions Directive could help close public enforcement gap
• Special Report: Has the GDPR failed?
• More user choice won’t fix adtech, MEP says
• Reynders confirms one-stop-shop harmonisation timeline
• Meta hit with biggest ever GDPR fine
• Maltese company faces second sanction for voter data breach
• Doctissimo faces €380,000 fine
• Full ECJ hears clashing views on IP data retention
• German regulators attempt to regulate undefined “sovereign cloud” market
• AI Act moves closer to finish line
• AI Act expected to pass by end of the year
• Amsterdam council DPO resigns after regulatory scrutiny
• German fines require negligent conduct, says ECJ adviser
• Kochava fights Idaho class action
• CNIL loses right to be forgotten appeal
• Data retention questions to be answered by ECJ’s full court
• Data Changemakers: Carly Kind
• CNIL annuls penalty payments
• Australian regulator causes data breach complaint confusion
• Dutch bank fined for security failures
• Austrian regulator sides with publishers in cookie paywall dispute
• TikTok faces billion-euro Portuguese mass claim
• Implement data minimisation or face CCPA litigation, says report
• Amsterdam court gives red light to Uber and Ola appeal
• ECJ says employee processing must meet GDPR safeguards
• Austrian credit scoring decision could lead to future damages, says noyb
• Civil society and industry face off on GDPR reform
• Google offers to settle Italian data portability probe
• German parties face unlawful political advertising accusations
• German government fights Facebook page ban
• Medical devices maker fined after two-month notification delay
• ECJ adviser says automated credit scoring is profiling
• EDPB begins work on DPO industry
• Blackbaud settles data breach investigation
• UK data reform legislation returns – again
• Aeries Software settles California data breach class action
• Another appeal over German non-material damages claim withdrawn
• Google secures win in private browsing class action
• ECJ clarifies interactions between GDPR and civil discovery
• “The truth is on the pitch”: German regulators on EDPB US adequacy opinion
• Noyb launches cookie identification complaint project
• Ireland and EDPB conflict escalates
• Belgian court overturns regulator’s decision in employment dispute
• German constitutional court restricts police data processing
• Credit broker told to delete unlawfully collected data
• Data Changemakers: Baroness Kidron
• Amazon wins employee data collection appeal against Lower Saxony regulator
• ECJ clarifies conditions for DPO dismissals

• Biden calls for federal data legislation
• Activists and DPC clash over European Commission monitoring plans
• Scott+Scott partners leave to form new litigation firm
• Luxembourg set to reform retention law
• Finnish regulator calls for supervisory role under upcoming EU data laws
• ECJ case may create “significant” insolvency hurdles
• Hamburg regulator granted further enforcement powers
• Finnish court sends questions about oral disclosure of data to ECJ
• ECJ to hear questions on impact of GDPR on debt collection
• French cookie campaign targets TikTok
• ECJ confirms broad scope of access rights
• Indian court rules on right to be forgotten
• LastPass sued over password leak data breach
• Mastercard settles German data breach claims
• German court adds to cookie banner troubles
• 2022 in fines
• ECJ advisers clarify scope of access rights
• Q&A: Meike Kamp
• ECJ strengthens right to be forgotten
• Grindr fine forwarded to Norwegian appeal board
• Another Google data monitoring California class action dismissed
• Data Changemakers: Evelyn Austin
• Israel proposes special treatment for EEA data
• ECJ to hear more access right questions
• Google loses another global right to be forgotten appeal
• Germany sets out health data principles
• Germany to declare use of Microsoft 365 by public authorities unlawful
• Saudi Arabia and NSO to face another spyware challenge in UK
• ECJ limits beneficial ownership register access
• Meta faces UK claim over ad profiling and objection rights
• CNIL fines Discord over inadequate data retention and security policies
• Finnish data and tax authorities clash over banking data sharing
• EDPS says upcoming product cybersecurity requirements need clarification
• GDPR consumer protection litigation right dispute returns to ECJ
• PimEyes faces further regulatory pressure
• Swedish court says GDPR complainants are parties to investigation
• ECJ rules on right to erasure from directories
• ECJ to hear question on covid-related QR code processing
• Deutsche Bahn sued for in-app tracking
• ICO fines defunct construction company
• Claimant-side stakeholders criticise GDPR private enforcement hurdles
• ECJ rules on purpose limitation and further processing
• German regulators “cautiously optimistic” about Privacy Shield replacement
• Bavarian regulator received no high-risk processing notifications since GDPR came into force
• ECJ adviser clarifies interactions between GDPR and civil procedural rules
• ECJ set to shut down swathes of damages claims
• Google faces Spanish complaint over Gmail dark patterns
• MEP says GDPR processing principles need rethinking
• Indian telecoms bill brings new data localisation concerns
• ECJ advocate-general issues first opinion on processing in employment context